Brooks Item ID: #301


Brooks Men’s Addiction Walker Walking Shoe



NOW $99.95

Product Information:

  • Binding : Apparel
  • Brand : Brooks
  • ClothingSize : One Size Fits All
  • Color : Mixed
  • Department : mens
  • FabricType : leather
  • Label : Brooks
  • ListPrice :
  • Manufacturer : Brooks
  • PackageDimensions :
  • ProductGroup : Sports
  • ProductTypeName : SHOES
  • Publisher : Brooks
  • Size : One Size Fits All
  • SKU : BRK978
  • Studio : Brooks
  • Style : addiction
  • Title : Brooks Men’s Addiction Walker Walking Shoe

Item Description

Men’s BROOKS® ADDICTION WALKER : : Walking is a serious addiction that afflicts millions of Americans. But there is hope in the form of the men’s Brooks® Addiction Walker shoe that gives you strong support and cushioning for those especially tough days. A specially designed stability system guides your stride into a natural, efficient path to bring hope and joy to your life! 14 ounces

Item Reviews

5 Responses to “Brooks Men’s Addiction Walker Walking Shoe”

  1. E. Huth says:

    Super comfortable walking shoe. Be careful with the width size because they seem to be a little narrower than a similar pair purchased 3 years ago.

  2. C. Bond says:

    This is such a great shoe that I bought some in black and white colors. These shoes are extremely comfortable for all day wear, and I find them to one of the better shoes I have worn.

  3. D. Jarvis says:

    I have a hard time finding the right shoe. I recommend these as a very comfortable shoe, well worth the money. Runs a bot small and narrow – I had to return my first pair for a 1/2 size large.

  4. Robert M. says:

    First rate product with quality construction and great foot support.

    I have this shoe in two colors. Great for wide feet.

  5. Dennis Adams says:

    My podiatrist recommended these shoes. This is my second pair. They are comfortable, come in my wide size, reasonably priced, and durable. Since they come in black, I can wear them in many situations where other sneaker-type shoes wouldn’t do.

Leave a Reply